Saturday, October 6

Here's another essay from a class I took at OSU. It's a little blurb about one of the most moving books I've ever read. We'd been discussing why Richard Wright published such a nasty review of Hurston's book when it came out, so my report begins with him. I hope that everyone will run right out and read the book if they haven't already; it's a true American classic.



Women’s Studies 367.04                                                        Emily Marlor
Critical Response #2                                                                       2/7/06

Their Eyes Were Watching God

          Richard Wright was not Hurston’s intended primary audience for Their Eyes Were Watching God. Clearly, he was so accustomed to having all art and media geared toward an assumed male audience that when he read a book by, about, and for a female sensibility, he didn’t understand it at all. Because his male experience was not foregrounded and privileged in the book, he dismissed it as without theme, message, and thought.
          I am also not Hurston’s primary audience, being white, but I can certainly appreciate the themes and message of the work. Perhaps that is because I, as a twenty-first century woman, am much less invested in the racist patriarchy in which I live than was even a black man in the early twentieth century. As a woman, I have been obliged to adapt to male-centered media, arts and popular culture my whole life, so I am used to putting myself in another’s place.
          The message that I brought away from my first reading of Their Eyes Were Watching God was a strong one of resilience and resistance. Janie survives her 20-year marriage to Joe without losing the spark of light that makes her special. Many women facing such a marriage in those times (or these times) would find it impossible to retain any vitality or individual personhood, some even slowly wasting toward death without really noticing. My belief is that Hurston wanted to tell a story that would inspire women to hold on to their divine dreams and grasp happiness when it came their way. By having Janie meet Tea Cake relatively late in life, when most women would have been sliding into sedate matronhood, Hurston shows us that it’s never too late to live happily, even if it isn’t “ever after.”
          I think that Hurston’s title reveals the main point of the story; that by keeping sight of the wonder and joy of life, Janie was able to weather the emotionally barren years of her marriage to Joe, and come out on the other side with her faith intact. The title is dramatically illustrated during the hurricane that Janie and Tea Cake live through. The folks huddled up in their flimsy shacks are helpless in the face of Nature’s fury, and all they can do is sit with big eyes straining to track the storm that might kill them. The narrator says they, “sat in company with the others…their souls asking if He meant to measure their puny might against His. They seemed to be staring at the dark, but their eyes were watching God,” (pg 187). In this way can powerless people survive the most horrible tragedies that befall them – by maintaining contact with something beyond their own lives and greater than even the most powerful earthly forces.

Wednesday, October 3

Old Stuff

Here's an essay I wrote for college a while back. I was taking an English course called "Writing Creative Nonfiction," which I very much enjoyed, and one of the assignments was to write about an object. I chose my refrigerator out of desperation and the fact that it was right there in front of me. Coming up with ideas of what to write about has always been the hardest part for me - if someone gives me a topic, I can talk for days, but making the choice on my own is impossible.




Emily Marlor
English 268
Prof. Steve Kuusisto
1/8/01

            It’s both common and unique; both a place and an object. From the outside it looks like an alien monolith, come to rest in my kitchen by mistake. I think maybe it was headed for Salisbury Plain to join its big brothers in Stonehenge and took a wrong turn somewhere. The unsettlingly ice-white exterior is camouflaged with old horoscopes and family photos held in place with brightly colored magnetic letters and crowded around Michelangelo’s David (today modestly clad in jeans). On the lower section I see more of the alphabet securing pizza coupons and a news article featuring a photo of my grandfather and his Jeep Wagoneer, all dressed up for Memorial Day. Also a rare magazine photo of Marilyn Monroe casually dressed and engrossed in a book, no cleavage in sight; this is one of my favorite images of the icon.
            The refrigerator is somewhat oracular for most Americans. We go to it when we don’t know what we want. We stand bathed in the chill and the 40-watt glow and we wait for some kind of gastric epiphany – we have faith that the perfect food is lurking there, just behind the pickles or last week’s mac and cheese. It will satisfy our cravings and fill our souls, we’re sure. Or at least we hope it won’t give us food poisoning. The challenge is to find just the right thing without upsetting the delicate eco-system that seems to appear in even the most regularly cleaned appliance.
            I remember when I moved into my little second-story nest, I was so excited to have a brand-new, real, grown-up-sized refrigerator. After the last one I had, with its less-than-reliable condenser and chronically constipated freezer compartment, it was so nice to imagine all of the gourmet leftovers I would be able to preserve in the gleaming depths of this new Frigidaire. But as I swing the door open from my unaccustomed position on the kitchen floor, contemplating the actual contents, I realize that the reality has rather a different look to it. The door seems to have some reasonably edible bottled goods – salsa, salad dressing, mustard, olives. But then my gaze falls on that jar of applesauce that moved in here with me two years ago and I’m now afraid to open, and I realize just why I eat at Wendy’s so often. The grape jelly next to the applesauce has a light green film on top, but I don’t have a biohazard suit, so there it will stay.
            The main compartment of the appliance is more crowded than usual due to an influx of groceries following the Christmas cash-giving season. I see a carton of actual eggs between the week-old take-out salad and the mysterious aluminum foil lump that may be something from the office holiday pot-luck. I’m proud to notice that I actually have produce in my “Fresh Produce” drawers – clementines and apples.
            The next shelf up supports the Kroger brand mayo that I’ve decided is just as good as Hellman’s because it costs about two dollars less. A bottle of peppermint schnapps keeps the black olives and beer company, right by the cherry preserves I got during last summer’s family vacation in Michigan at the height of cherry festival season. Something lurks in the depths of this least-visited shelf, but I’m afraid to look any closer. Let the mystery remain for a while. After all, look what happened to those overly curious people who looked into King Tut’s tomb...
            The most frequently used stuff is on the top shelf, so I don’t expect any surprises here. Still-fresh skim milk, cranberry juice, water filter, cottage cheese and month-old bread are the major players. Some fizzed-out tonic water stands forlorn in the corner, just hoping to hang on for a couple more days, maybe a week, before I get ambitious and start throwing things away. One unusual item is the jar of home-canned peach jam that was a Christmas gift from one of the bosses. For someone with no fresh bread in the house, I certainly have plenty of toast toppings.
            I have a friend who says you can tell who lives in a house just by looking in the fridge. When I had a roommate and a big kitchen, we always had at least four meals’ worth of food in our fridge and my friend would open the door and declare, “Chicks live here.” His own immaculate refrigerator contained no more than mixers for his cocktails and olives soaked in vermouth – sometimes there’d be leftover pizza, but only for one night before it was devoured. Chicks did not live there.
            When I go to my dad’s house, I invariably find myself gazing into his wall of food as if it has some answer that my callow young Frigidaire lacks. The fact that this was the source of countless after-school snacks and now harbors mid-western delicacies like stuffed peppers and pot roast that I can’t get at MacDonald’s seems to infuse the parental fridge with some kind of additional power. Like the stuffed animal my grandmother gave me on my second birthday and who still has a place at the foot of my bed (ok, sometimes under the foot of my bed), the old home refrigerator fills me with memories of a time when the most I had to worry about was whether Mom and Dad would try to feed me liver and onions for dinner.
            I find that there are some items that I always have, even though I don’t want them, just because we always had them around when I was a kid. It seems like my fridge, and its contents, link me to my past in a way I never noticed. I’m not even sure I like cottage cheese but, by god, I always have some in there.

Monday, October 1

Reality Check

Here's a job description for a position I've just applied for at OSU, plus my cover letter. I think it sounds pretty good, but I'd appreciate any feedback y'all would care to share with me. Thanks!
-E

Direct from the HR posting: "Provides administrative support for regional advancement program; maintains calendars; assists with developing and producing various written correspondence and documents; prepares and monitors budget; makes travel arrangements; processes fiscal and human resources forms; answers phones; maintains filing system and databases; provides excellent customer service to inquiries from staff, donors, university administrators and other constituents, maintaining a high level of confidentiality and performs other duties as assigned."

Dear Ms. XXX,

Thank you for considering me for the position of Office Associate with the Ohio State University Foundation.  You will find that my professional experience, work ethic and personal values make me a good fit for the position.

By always seeking to provide the highest quality work, I have successfully held positions with progressively increasing responsibility levels and a wide range of tasks.  My commitment to learning new skills and pushing my own boundaries in order to get the job done has enabled me to develop skills in communications, document design, logistics and schedule management.  I have demonstrated expertise in customer service, calendaring, writing, budget tracking and executive support.  In addition, I have successfully worked under conditions requiring frequent juggling of competing deadlines and shifting priorities, as well as handling sensitive and confidential information.

Because of my focus on small business, non-profit, and University offices, I have wide-ranging experience with all office functions.  I’ve done everything from working the reception desk to making budget and long-range planning judgments to creating complex reports and manuals.  I can set up efficient filing systems, create effective print materials and presentations, plan meetings and events, proofread dissertations, maintain websites, work out scheduling challenges, resolve equipment problems and manage databases.  My ability to see beyond emergent challenges and to envision creative long-term solutions has made me an invaluable resource to past employers.

For four years, I managed operations in a busy church in downtown Seattle.  I served as the communications liaison and public face for the parish, coordinated all events and activities on the church campus, created countless documents for internal and external use, arranged travel for clergy, managed several budget line-items and handled all purchasing for the office and facilities.  As an active participant in all stewardship campaigns at the church, I proofread and edited letters, tracked pledges and gifts, and generated thank-you notes using the mail merge functions of both Word and a church-specific database.

I am able to learn new tasks with minimal training and have excellent interpersonal skills.  I have experience working with a diverse array of personalities and ages, and truly enjoy interacting with people of different backgrounds.  My observation has been that individual differences make the team stronger and mutual respect allows people with varying points of view to work together productively.

I hope that you will agree that my qualifications and skills would make me a valuable addition to your team.  If you would like to contact me, please call 614-XXX-XXXX or email XXXXX@msn.com.

Sincerely,

Emily Marlor

Wednesday, September 19

Channeling Donna Reed

As the daughter and grand-daughter of feminists (yes, my grand-parents were feminists, even though they would never have used the term themselves), I have always thought that it was my right and my duty to Have a Career.  However, I discovered in high school that I really had very little interest in any such thing.  I’d been told for years that I had “such potential,” and that I could do and be whatever I wanted, that when it came time to have the discussions with my guidance counselor about what I wanted to be when I grew up, I simply could not make a decision.  Faced with a vast array of ill-defined options, my mind shut down and I refused to deal.  Hence, I went to college at age 18 because that is what one was supposed to do, and I didn’t have any alternative plans in mind.

Hampered by such a complete lack of motivation and direction, I naturally put the bare minimum of effort into my courses…and then I stopped putting any effort into them.  I dropped out before they could kick me out (which turned out to be a really good thing later on), and I joined the work force.  I still had no interest in any kind of Career, because what that meant to me was having to wear suits and pantyhose, and dealing with Corporate Ladders and office politics and backstabbing co-workers.  What I wanted was just a low-stress kind of job that would engage my mind and abilities while allowing me to contribute something useful to the world.

What I ended up with was a string of frustrating, unsatisfying, dead-end jobs that I gritted my teeth and coped with until I was able to move on to the next job, which I always hoped would be better.  There were a few bright spots (Thank you, Bonnie! Thank you, College of Ed!) and I was always able to learn a few new skills from each painful experience, so it sort of felt like I was making progress toward something that would finally fulfill my needs.  I had been operating with the philosophy that the tasks I completed were less important than the fact that I was doing necessary work for a good cause.  However, I finally realized that simply contributing to a worthy endeavor is not really enough for me any more; I need to be doing work that stretches and engages me, in addition to being worthwhile in a larger sense.

I still believe that it is possible to have such a fulfilling and meaningful job, but my search for one has been, so far, unsuccessful.  I suppose I must be looking in the wrong places or taking the wrong approach, but it’s terribly hard to figure out any other ways to go about it, especially since I can’t settle on one specific goal and spend all my energy on moving in that direction.  This is the danger of being a generalist as well as harboring a severe commitment phobia.  I could be doing so many things that I feel unable to choose just one, for fear that it will turn out to the wrong choice.

But back to Donna Reed and my ingrained feminism.  These past months (almost 23 of them, now) have been terribly difficult in terms of my feelings of self-worth and self-confidence, but they have also been a lot of fun, with plenty of time to play with my family and friends.  And I find that the cooking I’ve been doing is more satisfying than almost anything I’ve done professionally.  Not quite everything, but close.  Which causes me to wonder if I would actually be happy being a housewife.

But wondering that makes me question everything I was raised to believe, so then I need to take some time and work it all out.  I’ve been doing just that for a while now, and have come to some conclusions.  First, the point of the Women’s Movements was to ensure that women had the opportunities to contribute fully to society in the ways that suited them best as individuals, recognizing that no group of people will all have the same strengths and needs, just because they all share one characteristic.  Second, this does not mean that women who find themselves happiest when running a household are somehow un-feminist, it just means that those skills required for such a job are their strengths.

I took some Cultural Anthropology courses when I was taking my second stab at college, and I learned something really interesting about the historical (and, indeed, Pre-Historical) division of labor.  The men mostly went out hunting, and also pursued the sort of warfare that involved ranging far afield to loot their neighbors and expand the clan’s territory.  The women mostly did the gathering, which could be done nearer to the homes and could also include hauling the children around with them, since the women were the ones who could breast-feed the babies.  What we tend to forget is that the women were also in charge of defending the homes and driving off the wild animals and somewhat wilder men who might come around while the local menfolk were off hunting the wild whatsits to feed everyone through the winter.  So it’s not like women’s work was less valuable/valued than men’s work way back in the day – in fact, the main tasks of passing on the heritage and protecting the next generation were handled largely by the women.  And any doofus can see the value of that.

Somewhere along the line, the thinking about division of labor along gender lines became imbued with value judgments, and for some reason the work done largely by women was judged to be less important, which carried with it the additional baggage of labeling the women themselves as less valuable to society than men.  Except in their ability to bear children, on which women have always had a pretty secure monopoly.  Therefore, it gradually became socially acceptable for women to stay at home and bear children, and that was all.  If a woman was unfortunate enough to be unable to conceive for whatever reason, she was expected to turn her energy toward helping the other (more worthy) women to raise/educate/nurse their offspring.

I do wonder exactly how and when that transition from valued contributor to brood mare happened, but I don’t think there’s any way to pinpoint the moment, more’s the pity.  My point here is that women finally got organized enough to point out the stupidity of dismissing half the adult population’s ideas, skills, potential and contributions, simply because they could (theoretically) give birth, too.  Sheer waste of resources, if you ask me; I mean, maybe some woman discovered the uses of Penicillin three hundred years ago, but was never able to bring the discovery to light because no-one would listen to her.

I seem to have wandered off again.  It’s so much easier to have a polemic rant than an introspective revelation.  My point was that I think I might be completely happy running a household – cooking, scrubbing, tidying, painting, grubbing in the garden, making grocery lists, running errands, tending to the pets, planning meals, etc., etc., etc.  Actually, this stuff requires a lot of the same skills I’ve been using as a secretary/office manager/executive wrangler for years.  Plus, there’s a complete absence of anyone acting like I’m invisible or blaming me for his fuck-ups.  The main problem with my current situation (and it’s a biggie) is that this house where I live isn’t mine in any sense at all.  I’m also not getting quite a number of my other needs met, but I’m used to that, so it’s easier to ignore for the time being.  This issue of non-ownership seems to be the main stumbling-block right now, which makes me think that if I’d made different choices about a job path, not to mention my decision to run screaming from anything even smelling like a committed relationship in my 20s and 30s, I might be able to afford my own house by now.  I might even have a man to share it with.

Of course, I have always done everything later than everyone else, from walking to riding a bike to wild partying and the consequent soul-searching.  So it’s not really surprising that, at age 41, I’m finally feeling ready to be domestic and permanent with someone, which most people seem to do somewhere around age 30.  Sadly, I’ve spent so much time and energy dealing with the fallout of my inability (unwillingness?) to commit to a career, and so much of my emotional mojo figuring out my thoughts about the large existential questions of life, the universe and everything, that now I have no real resources or skills needed to find a mate.

I’m thinking that some nice guy in Alaska might need a mail-order bride; maybe he’ll overlook the double chin, since I can cook up a storm.

Friday, September 14

Learning Curve

Tonight I got to witness a learning moment for a little boy, and I'm not sure I'll ever be the same. I was messing with a bubble-gun when my cousin's 18-month-old son, Coen, came up to see what I was doing.  The thing works by pressing a trigger that turns a fan to blow air through a ring that is supposed to be dipped into soap suds. I didn’t have the suds, what with being inside and all, but even without the bubble juice, this is a pretty cool toy.

So when Coen came to investigate, I showed him how I was pressing the trigger, then I put his fingers on it to let him do it. The fan was aimed at him, so when he got the hang of the trigger button, he got a faceful of air, which made him smile. He worked it over and over again, observing the cause-and-effect relationship between what his fingers did and what his face felt. I swear I could see his mind cataloging the phenomenon and reckoning how it worked.

We did this for a few minutes and then he was distracted by the advent of the Bringers of the Ice Cream. After we’d enjoyed our Graeter’s and messed around with other toys for a while, he picked up the bubble-gun again. I wondered if he’d remember how to work it, and I was impressed to see that he not only remembered, he’d improved on his previous performance! Earlier he’d been using his index and second fingers to push the trigger, but this time he swung the toy around and used his thumb – a much more powerful tool for the job at hand, and at a better angle for getting the air to blow on him. Genius.

Wednesday, September 12

Huh

I had a strange experience today: I met a child who I feel quite sure is the re-embodiment of my step-brother. My uncle Earl, my cousin Logan and her 18-month-old son have come to town for a visit, and when I saw the child for the first time, he looked me straight in the eyes and I thought, "Oh, hi there, Grey." The boy, whose name is Coen, doesn't look like Grey at all, really, except for a superficial similarity around the ears and hairline, but I swear that there was that moment of recognition between us.

I guess this is as good a place as any to expand on one of the deeply-held beliefs that I listed in a previous post, to wit, “Energy is never lost, it simply changes form.” Yes, this is a paraphrase of the First Law of Thermodynamics, but I have always felt that it has a much larger application, beyond the usual physics classes.

If you can imagine the universe as a closed system (albeit a really big one), in which there is a constant level of matter/energy, then it’s pretty simple to conceive of death as a transformation rather than a loss. The body, of course, is matter and returns to its component parts as it is re-absorbed into the earth, whether buried, cremated, or donated to science.

The spirit, soul, psyche, essence or whatever you want to call it is basically energy, so it also is recycled, since it cannot simply disappear into nothingness, what with being part of a closed system. Therefore, it seems logical that the thing that makes someone a person might find itself clothed in a new body after it is separated from the old one.

For all of written history (and considerably before that, from what we can tell) people all over the world have come up with different ways to explain the idea that death is not the end of a person. Some of the stories we tell ourselves make some sense to me, but they are almost all draped in so much pomp and fear that my straightforward self shies away form them. I distrust any explanation or organization that seems to layer too much complication and mystery on anything, so I have spent the past couple of decades considering the various explanations offered up, and I like mine best. It’s simple, it’s logical, it’s elegant, and it allows for the fact that we are really all just guessing about the nature of life, the universe and everything.

Tuesday, September 11

Creed

I thought I'd share with you some of the bits of philosophy that I hold dear. Some of them started out as lines from books or movies and were certainly not intended to become part of anyone's lifeview, but I'm a scavenger and a thief when it comes to ideas - I take what I need from whatever sources present themselves. Actually, that's recycling, right? So it's all good.

I'll just list them here to begin with, but I plan to expand and expound on them one at a time over the next few weeks.

-There is no one, true way
-Change is always possible
-Do unto others as you'd have others do unto you
-Pay attention
-A life lived in fear is a life half-lived
-Good manners are a way of showing respect for others, not a way to feel superior
-What you say reflects and shapes what you think
-My will is as strong as yours, and my kingdom as great; You have no power over me
-Energy is never lost, it simply changes form
-There are some things that aren't our job; they might not even be our business

As with all human beings, I'm not fully living up to all of my goals and beliefs at all times, but it's important to have them anyway.

The Rites of Fall

[In the interests of attitude adjustment, I'm going to write the ode to autumn that I was working out in my head yesterday before the Judgment Fairy took possession of my mind. It might be less entertaining to read than the rant I could be writing, but I hope that it will be more therapeutic for me, and less detrimental to my blood pressure.]

Ah, Autumn! For me, this is the season of renewal and rebirth, no matter what the silly poets (and several world religions) might say about spring. When the weather is hot and humid, my will to move, think, write, cook, speak and play decreases by about 75%. The sunshine gets up my nose and makes me sneeze, and all the blooming plants, while beautiful, are busily sending pollen-bombs toward my defenseless nasal passages, too. I get burnt if I go out without the sweater-in-a-bottle level of sunblock, and the sky looms relentlessly blue over me.

So with the coming of cool nights, thunderstorms, air you breathe rather than suck on, and daytime highs in the 70s, I feel like I've been released from nature's sweatbox, and have been let into her parlor, where I'll be offered a nice glass of milk and maybe some cookies. Mother Nature makes a damn fine gingersnap.

Maybe it's due to more than a dozen years spent returning to school in the Fall, but something in me always wants to start doing stuff this time of year. I want to learn, travel, cook, plan, or at least talk earnestly about things. This being the year that I began cooking for real, I’m naturally spending a lot of time and thought planning out great stuff to make. In the summer, nobody wants to eat chili or stew or heavy gravy-based foods, which are my forté, so now I get to start back in with all the comfort foods that come so naturally. A few days ago I made a lamb stew that started with a recipe from my Irish Pub cookbook. I tweaked it a bit, as is my wont, and it was so good that I wish I’d written down what I did. It was a “white stew,” which means that you don’t brown the meat -- you just throw everything in, add some liquid and cook it forever at a low temp. It also didn’t have (much) flour, so it ended up with more of a broth than a gravy, which was my sole excuse for doing it when the weather was still pretty hot.

My next move will probably be in the chicken-n-dumpling family, since that’s once of my favorites, or – oooh – maybe a pot pie, since I have a spare crust lingering in the freezer.

I also want to take long tramps through the woods with my fella and my dog, cozily wrapped in my tweeds and brogues, breathing crisp air laden with the tang of apples and wafts of wood-smoke. Then we’ll get back to the cabin and snuggle down with the cat and drink mulled wine in front of the fireplace. Oh, wait, I don’t have a fella, a dog, or a cat, let alone a cabin in the woods. And I don’t live in an Eddie Bauer advert.

But that’s always the image that this season brings to the surface of my mind, along with the more realistic expectations of football traffic, chapped lips, holey socks, and family-crazed holiday gatherings. And it’s the reality that I love, because it comes complete with that shade of blue that you only see in an Ohio sky in October, and the knowledge of absolute acceptance from my crazed family, and hot spiced cider, and a roof over my head, and apple picking, and pumpkin carving, and people to cook for. So, thanks, Mother Nature, for letting me make it through the summer so I can enjoy another beautiful Autumn. I'll try to use it wisely.



Friday, September 7

I'm going to start off telling you all about one of my favorite movies of all time - Notorious.

This Hitchcock film stars Ingrid Bergman and Cary Grant, two of the most watchable people I've ever seen. The story takes place just after the Second World War, and features Bergman as the daughter of a German spy and an American mother. Her father has just been sentenced to life in prison, and Alicia Huberman (Bergman) is pursuing life as a dissipated party girl, throwing parties for equally shallow people and planning boat trips with lecherous old men -- basically acting like a self-indulgent brat, or a woman trying to smother her pain and distress.

Enter the mysterious Devlin (Grant, of course), who turns out to be under assignment from the U.S. government to recruit Alicia for a covert operation to unearth Nazis in South America, one of whom was friends with her father. Alicia rudely (and drunkenly) refuses, on the grounds that she is neither a spy nor a patriot. Devlin neatly undercuts her by playing a recording of her arguing with her father about his anti-American activities; she passionately declares her love for the land of her mother and pleads with her father to stop. Confronted with her basic soundness of character and the folly of carrying on pretending not to care, she accepts the job.

It turns out that the man Alicia is supposed to get close to is a scientist named Alex Sebastian (Claude Rains, the wicked old thing), who had a crush on Alicia when he worked with her father. When Devlin finds out that Alicia's assignment will involve her seducing Sebastian, he objects, since he's already falling in love with her. His superiors override him, assuming that she will not balk at the task, since she's already marked as a loose woman because of her wild days, which admittedly were only a week or so behind her. But she has reformed because she's fallen in love with Devlin, too, and she's appalled and hurt when he comes to tell her what she's meant to do. There's a wrenching scene where her tender new self-respect is squashed by his cold cruelty; she begs him to not let her do it, but he just says that it's up to her, and he knows she's up to the job. His (pretended) indifference drives to her despair, so she dives into the job and ends up not only lovers with Sebastion, but married to him.

There is danger all around Alicia, but she is determined to carry on, at least to prove her loyalty to her adopted country, even if she knows that her love has deserted her. Devlin makes arrangements to have someone else take on the job as Alicia's contact, but she doesn't show up for the meeting when he was going to break the news. She finally arrives, late and in obvious ill-health. She passes it off as a hangover, but really she's being poisoned by Sebastian's mother, who lives with them and has begun to suspect Alicia.

What makes this movie so great is the simplicity of the narrative combined with great skill in the telling of the story and with skillfull acting. As with most of Hitchcock's movies, there is a sense of a great deal of expirtise in the crafting of the whole thing. From lighting (so vital in black & white films) to camera angles to the soundtrack, everything is planned out to support the emotional turns evoked by the actors. While Cary Grant can be accused of always playing the same character in all his roles, he substantially tones down his suavity for this one. He spends a great deal of time hiding his emotions and pretending he doesn't care about Alicia, and it's believeable because of his bitterness at having to put the mission ahead of his own desires. It seems natural that the situation would evoke just that kind of reaction from a man with believes in the work he's doing.

Meanwhile, Bergman doesn't allow herself to simply look beautiful (although she can hardly help being stunning), she also is convincingly and sweetly vulnerable when she is first in love, and then she snaps closed again when her man doesn't show that he believes she's changed. He is basically pimping her out for the good of the cause, and that's gotta hurt, no matter how noble the cause is. The writing gives her a solid foundation, but it's her emotion that sells us on the idea that she would go through with the plan, once her rose-colored dreams of romance with Dev have been dashed.

It's worth mentioning the kiss scene that was devised to thwart the censors. It happens during the only sweet romantic scene we see between Alicia and Devlin, when she's getting established in her apartment in Rio, waiting for Sebastian to arrive in town so she can accidentally meet him. At this point, neither she nor Devlin know the details of her assignment, and they are swooningly in love. She is flitting around the apartment making plans for dinner, explaining how she has such great ambitions to become a good girl, even learning how to cook and making jokes about how he'll eat whatever she makes, no matter how it turns out. During all of this delightful silliness, he gets a phone call telling him to come to the office for instructions, and while he's on the phone, she is clinging to him and kissing him repeatedly - brief little kisses that add up to the cumulative effect of a long, intimate moment, but slipped by the censors because their rule was only about the length of time of each kiss, not how many could be packed into a few seconds. Of course, when we find out soon thereafter what the men on the other end of that phone call had planned for her, it twists the sweetness of the moment into something nasty.

Of course, the best part of the story is the ending, but I won't ruin it by telling you what happens. I'll just say that I'm a sucker for neatly tied-off storylines and a general feeling of justice for all. Also, remember not to drink anything that suspected Nazis prepare for you.


Something's Gotta Give (doesn't it?)

I've been unemployed for almost two years. God, that's hard to accept. Whatever doubts I've had about my social, emotional, physical, and romantic abilities, I've always known that I am a damn good worker and a valuable (though not always valued) employee wherever I've found myself working. And I never really had to concern myself with the possibility of not being hired when I went looking for a new job; unemployment stats baffled me, since my experience was that it only took two or three interviews before a job offer materialized from one of them. I am now one of those stats.

My belief in my professional self was shaken when I moved to Seattle and spent four months hunting for work, going on interviews and feeling that I had nailed it and an offer was just a day or two away. Time after time my hopes were dashed as I watched my bank balance dwindle away. When I finally did get an offer, it was doing a job that proved to be both mind-numbingly boring and heart-breakingly difficult. I found myself unable to connect with my new boss in any important way; we bonded briefly over our mutual appreciation for Irish whisky, but our attitudes and values regarding accountability, professionalism, mutual respect, and communication were so widely divergent that there was essentially no common ground. As the underling, I felt it was my responsibility to adapt to his ways, and lord knows I tried. But every attempt was met with indifference, confusion, or outright hostility, so I gave up.

Eventually, I not only gave up trying to figure out what my boss wanted, but I also felt myself losing the will to do good work for its own sake. This scared me, because my work ethic and sense of pride in work well-done have always been such an essential part of who I am. During this time I was also applying for jobs, mostly at the University of Washington, but despite a few very promising interviews, nothing came of it. Naturally, this made me feel even more unsure about my worth as an employee, and the daily atmosphere at work of being inadequate and wrong bolstered those feelings.

After two years of trying to resolve such an untenable situation, my natural optimism had eroded to almost nothing, and I decided that I needed to get away from the toxic situation I was in, since I was clearly not able to fix it. After a visit home for Thanksgiving, I made the resolution to quit my soul-sucking job and move back to Columbus, where at least I had an emotional support network.

Part of the reason it took me so long to make the decision (aside from my innate mulishness) was that my step-brother lived in the Seattle area, and I loved being able to see him regularly. For the first 15 years of our related-ness, he lived across the country from me and I only saw him once or twice a year. Our understanding and appreciation of each other had developed gradually and steadily until he became one of my truest friends. I respected, adored, and admired him, and his presence in Seattle was a large part of why I moved there. However, it had finally become clear to me that my mental health was being threatened by my situation, so I made up my mind to break the news to my brother and his wife at Christmas-time. It was three days before Christmas that my brother was diagnosed with an aggressive form of brain tumor, and he had surgery the next day. My plans were suddenly put on hold as the entire family went into shock, and then into crisis mode, where we stayed for the next year.

My work troubles became very much parenthetical during the time of research, treatment, intense hope and despair, heartsick laughter, urgent tenderness, spiritual discussions, reluctant acceptance, and one wonderful family vacation to Alaska during a time of relative optimism. After 14 months of battle, he died in his bed, with his wife beside him and love all around. As allies in the fight, my sister-in-law and I had started to develop a bond with our mutual love for Grey as the foundation. We have very little else in common, but I felt that it was important for me to support her after his death as I had tried to do during his illness. I have the luxury of a much firmer emotional and spiritual base than she has, and she had turned to me with her fears and doubts about what was happening to her beloved. It seemed like I could do some good by staying in Seattle to be of service to her until she had moved through the initial stages of grief. Of course, my own ego was part of this decision, because it felt good to believe that I could be a source of strength and wisdom, but mostly it just felt like the right thing to do -- in my world, family is paramount, and you do whatever is needed.

Eventually, it became clear to me that my sister-in-law either didn't want/need my support, or she was unable to see/accept what I was offering. As with the horrible job, I gave it my best until I was forced to accept that this was a situation I could not fix. So, a few months after my brother died, I quit my job, packed up my stuff, and moved back to Columbus. A friend had agreed to let me stay in her spare room until I could find work and get my own place. I warned her that it might be a matter of months, given my experience in Seattle, but didn't actually believe that it would take that long to find a job. And now here I am, 22 months later, still trying to figure out what I'm doing wrong.



Randomly listed movies that I enjoy (to be reviewed here eventually, for your enlightenment)

  • Inkheart
  • Victor/Victoria
  • Some Like it Hot
  • Holiday
  • The Holiday (not the same thing)
  • Stage Door
  • Mystery, Alaska
  • Fight Club
  • Up
  • Serenity
  • Follow the Fleet
  • Notorious (the one from the '40s)
  • Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
  • To Catch a Thief
  • Stardust
  • Stage Beauty
  • Robin Hood (Russell Crowe version)
  • Die Hard
  • the Bourne trilogy
  • Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day
  • The Avengers (the new one)
  • A Life Less Ordinary
  • Henry & June
  • To Have and Have Not
  • Ocean's 11
  • Out of Sight
  • Con Air
  • Say Anything
  • The Princess Bride
  • Willow
  • Cast Away
  • Labyrinth
more to come...

Thursday, September 6

Bowie

Right, so I'm finally getting this underway, but I don't have anything particular to say right now, so I'll just let y'all know that I'm currently listening to David Bowie. He's wailing away about how we can be heroes, just for one day, and he sounds pretty damn good.

The idea here is that I'm good at writing, so I should be doing it for a living, or at least for the edification of myself and others. An interesting assertion, but the problem is that I've never had that burning need to write, which seems to be the hallmark of actual writers. What I do have is a facility with language and a certain knack for finding apt turns of phrase. I also have a burning need -- compulsion, really -- to edit, proofread, and analyze writing wherever I find it. Can't stop myself, and it's gotten me in trouble a few times, so I guess I'm a natural-born editor. I chose not to get a degree in English, Communications, or Journalism, however, so there seems to be fuck-all I can with my natural ability other than irritate people. Pity.

Bowie is now singing Fashion, which is not one of my favorites. Hold on a sec...OK, now I've got Under Pressure, which I love. Freddie Mercury was an amazing performer with a splendid voice, which blends very nicely with Bowie's.

Getting back to the reasons for this blog, I guess the main one is inherently selfish; I want to put my writing into the public sphere so that eventually I'll have enough built up that I can use it as a sort of portfolio when I ask someone to pay me to write. As previously mentioned, I don't have the kind of degree that leads obviously into a career in writing/editing/publishing/etc., so having something concrete to prove that I know what I'm doing seems like a good idea.

I haven't explored the features here yet, but I hope to be able to have categories: food & cooking, movies, books, social commentary, personal life observations, etc. I think I'll go have a look around now. See you later...